Wednesday, April 23, 2014

RANKING THE G5 IN FOOTBALL 2014 SEASON


1. AAC: It's hard to argue against the AAC taking the top spot in the G5 race. With a Fiesta Bowl win by UCF and a National Championship by UCONN, The AAC seems to be firmly in
first place for the moment. The AAC has had, however, its fair share of difficult moments. Aresco held the league together with duct tape and super glue in the summer of 2013. Aresco, who is also the chief cheerleader for the American, recently acknowledged in the Orlando
Sun-Sentinel, that it is going to be hard to compete
against the P5. It's a challenge  he said the American is up to. For now, however,  he and the American are enjoying the view from the top.




2.  Mountain West: The Mountain West is a good sports league. The problem with good however, is that good rarely gets attention from the  media or the sports world like being great or  being very bad does. The MWC is in a strange place this year. For the first time in a long time, its premiere team, Boise State, is without its excellent football coach, Chris Peterson. Couple this with a lackluster  basketball season, and the Mountain West is due for a bit of Spring cleaning.





3. This might come as a surprise to some people, but not to those who follow the Belt closely.  The Sun Belt has earned its number 3 rating because of strong football and strong football schools that have been added since realignment. App State and Ga Southern were excellent  picks for the Sunbelt.  The Sunbelt has more pure football schools in its conference than the MAC and CUSA do. What the Sun Belt is missing however, is competitive basketball. Sun Belt basketball should be sued for gross negligence. If I were Commissioner  Karl Benson, I would hold an emergency meeting with the conference AD's to discuss the dismal state of Sun Belt basketball. On the other hand, football schools like Ark State, ULL and the new additions of the Sunbelt should keep this league competitive for many years to come.



4. Many might think that the MAC should be higher than number 4. The problem for the MAC however, is that its top teams, including NIU, have faired horribly when playing competition from the other G5 Sports leagues. There of course, some very solid teams in the MAC, OHIO, Toledo, Bowling Green, and Ball State, are some of them. When these schools however, play in Bowl Games, they often show a real lack of depth and talent to compete with the top schools from other G5. I like the MAC. I think they do more with less better than any conference in the G5. Until however, they prove that they can be more competitive agains other G5 schools in games that matter, they will remain number 4 on my list.


5. Where do I begin. This once proud Mid Major has fallen on hard times lately. Its best schools, Tulsa, Houston, UCF and ECU have all been carried  away by the fancy talk of Mike Aresco and the
AAC. Only Southern Miss , traditionally( until recently of course) one of the best programs in Conf USA is left. There still are a few solid teams in CUSA, Marshall being the top of the list right now. But in terms of realignment , Commissioner Britton Banowsky, gambled on large markets instead of teams with a proven record of winning in football. So far this strategy has not paid off for Conf USA. Schools like North Texas, MTSU and LA Tech, as well as ODU, and UNC-Charlotte will have to prove themselves worthy of carrying on the the  Conf USA legacy of being a good competitive league.  Until that happens, Conf USA is in the midst of one serious identity crisis. Here is the good news for Conf USA: The sports league has tremendous upside and  potential. If the new teams can gel with each other and form a strong bond of competition, Conf USA can and should move quickly up the scale and be near the top again.

12 comments:

  1. This is a G5 blog isn't it? Then don't you think it's about time for a Mountain West logo refresh?
    It's been two years since the conference changed it's logo.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First, glad you found us. Second, correction made. My apologies to the Mountain West Fans.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the logo refresh. I for one will be following this blog since it should be an interesting first year of the playoff system. All the best!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great to have you on board. Thanks for following the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. While it is necessary to be good in basketball, there is no question football drives the realignment bus. IMO, Banowsky going after large markets instead of solid regional football programs will turn out being a big mistake. There is no possible way CUSA's next TV contract is anywhere close to what it is now. That loss of revenue places a priority on game attendance for home team revenue. I still hold hope there will be add'l membership tweaking down the road. CUSA & the SunBelt need to be more regionally based. Common sense tells you La Tech, N Texas, Rice, S Miss, Texas State, UTEP and UTSA should to be in the SunBelt, with App, Ga Southern, Ga State and Troy in CUSA giving each conference 12 schools. Then again, common sense has little to do with college athletics these days.

    ReplyDelete
  6. While you are refreshing conference logos, the Sun Belt has a new logo effective last summer. There's a lot of potential with the Sun Belt. The past two years have shown that the perception of the Sun Belt is not reality, as the SBC was rated higher than CUSA and MWC in 2012 and higher than CUSA and MAC in 2013. Don't be surprised if the league has a breakout year in 2013. A lot of the SBC's future lies with new football-only members New Mexico State and Idaho. Can they improve enough to contribute to the league? Or will they drag it down?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Might want to update the Sun Belt logo too while you're at it

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, the MWC was clearly the best G5 football league this year and got the Access Bowl spot, while the AAC fell flat. So I guess this prediction was wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Steve, You are correct, I got this one wrong. The AAC had an off year and the MWC got the Access Bowl.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ooops. Looks like a bad year for predictions. Final results were MW, CUSA, AAC, MAC, SB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Before you make declarative headlines remember the operative word is research. C-USA was 4 and 1 in bowl season and 17 and 4 against other G5 conference teams during the season. That sounds like dominance to me.

      http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/12/27/conference-usa-made-a-statement-this-bowl-season/

      ALL G5 Conference Comparisons 2014 as of 12/26/14

      #1 CUSA
      CUSA 3 MWC 3
      CUSA 3 AAC 1
      CUSA 7 MAC 0
      CUSA 4 SBC 0
      CUSA Wins 17 Other G5 Losses 4

      #2 MWC
      MWC 3 CUSA 3
      MWC 2 AAC 1
      MWC 1 MAC 0
      MWC 4 SBC 1
      MWC Wins 10 Other g5 Losses 5

      #3 AAC
      AAC 1 CUSA 3
      AAC 1 MWC 2
      AAC 2 MAC 0
      AAC 1 SBC 0
      AAC Wins 5 Others G5 Losses 5

      #4 MAC
      MAC 0 CUSA 7
      MAC 0 AAC 2
      MAC 0 MWC 1
      MAC 2 SBC 1
      MAC Wins 2 Other G5 Losses 11

      #5 SBC
      SBC 0 CUSA 4
      SBC 1 MAC 2
      SBC 0 AAC 1
      SBC 1 MWC 4
      SBC Wins 2 Other G5 Losses 11

      Delete